10/13/2021 0 Comments Google Toolbar For Chrome Mac
Others used content scripts to create extensions with more subtle features bundled together that were harder to attribute to specific extensions.It might have been helpful for Google to have created a sample extension as a “don’t do this” example. Bizarrely, Google chose instead to illustrate the problem using an infamous gag screenshot of the seven-year-old Internet Explorer 7 stuffed to the limit with toolbars and add-on panes.Even more bizarrely, the second toolbar in that screenshot is from … Google.Which is a little like complaining about your neighbor's ugly house, then spray-painting graffiti on his front door to prove your point.Google won't allow third-party developers to build toolbars for Chrome, but the company still makes its own toolbar for Internet Explorer and distributes that toolbar widely. With content scripts, extension developers have full control over the page, so they can put up as much UI as they want, even going as far as to create toolbars in the page. Similarly, toolbars that provide a broad array of functionality or entry points into services are better delivered as separate extensions, so that users can select the services they want.The post doesn’t contain any specific examples of extensions that violate that original principle, only describing the problem in generic terms:E couldn't enforce these design goals technically. For example, functionality that displays product ratings and reviews, but also injects ads into web pages, should not be bundled into a single extension. If two pieces of functionality are clearly separate, they should be put into two different extensions, and users should have the ability to install and uninstall them separately. Do not create an extension that requires users to accept bundles of unrelated functionality, such as an email notifier and a news headline aggregator.
![]() Google Toolbar For Chrome Software They InstalledEffective in January, extensions can only be sideloaded in Developer mode or using enterprise policy.The new policy takes effect immediately for new extensions. Indeed, another new policy, announced last month, requires all extensions for Chrome on Windows to be hosted in the Chrome Web Store. Needless to say, the ad revenue doesn't go to the owner of the website.Google's blog post also briefly mentions the problem of “sideloading”:Hen extensions were sideloaded locally on their computer (perhaps bundled as part of another piece of software they installed) the user wouldn't have the benefit of the information in the Chrome Web Store at all, so they might not realize they were agreeing to install an extension with unwanted functionality or poor reviews.Nothing in the new policy prohibits sideloading, although that language appears to be a shot across the bow at developers who go outside the Chrome Web Store.![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorSara ArchivesCategories |